Reply With Quotelol why are they comparing a Group B car capable of 0-100 in 2.4sec to a rusty USDM
ae86, oh becuase the 86 has nos
transformers 2?
Originally Posted by ae86
lol why are they comparing a Group B car capable of 0-100 in 2.4sec to a rusty USDM
ae86, oh becuase the 86 has nos
Just watched it then. There's already a few technical bloopers in the vid. When the wrx rolls, it has no drive shaft or gearbox which is lol. And the GTR is drifting all over the place, gtr's don't do that, oh and they used a take where the r34 would have spun but the chopped it together with some other footage to make it appear as though it didn't.
Still a decent movie, it's good to watch just don't take it seriously. And lol at all the hot chicks around the cars, reality is that there's no girls in the car scene like that, you can have your pick of vce students though ahah
The story is about 5 years from number 1....
So about 3-4 from number 2.......
It is mweant to be before Tokyo drift.... (my guess, based on the end and Vin d.)
Just about to watch it now, will give opinion in 1hr 39mins lol.
Ok so it wasnt that bad. Not good though haha. And i did notice the driveline-less upsidedown wrx. NSX was nice at the end.
Last edited by ae71neo; 12th April 2009 at 08:14 PM.
Tokyo drift was mad for one thing. Japanese gangers. fwahhh
I enjoyed tokyo drift
not because of the drifting, but because it managed to pull off an alright storyline and still really focused on cars and driving, fnf4 just did not pull that off
Travis
You guys act like its a documentary or something.
Its a movie made for the masses, not car enthusiasts.
Its. Just. A. Movie.
Its not SUPPOSE to be realistic.
fast and furious 4 wasn't as good as u think it would be.it hade more mussel cars.hardly any imports this time
i'll probably go check it out
Posting Permissions
